The Psychological Torture of Gaslighting

Before we had a word for it, fiction was already writing it down. Gaslighting is the manipulation of someone into doubting their own perceptions, memories, and sense of reality, and it is not a new phenomenon. It named Merriam-Webster’s word of the year in 2022, but the behavior it describes stretches back centuries.

Gaslighting is the deliberate manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality. It is not simply lying. It is a sustained, strategic campaign to make another person feel that their instincts, memories, and observations cannot be trusted, leaving the gaslighter in control of what is true.

The term gaslighting comes from Gas Light, a 1938 British stage play by Patrick Hamilton. In it, a husband manipulates his wife into believing she is going mad, dimming the gas lights in their home and flatly denying that the light has changed at all. The play was adapted into a popular 1944 film, and the term eventually found its way into the psychological vocabulary, going mainstream in the 2010s.

Hamilton understood something essential: gaslighting is not impulsive cruelty. It is patient, methodical, and always working toward something. In the play, the husband wants his wife’s inheritance. The madness he manufactures is just a means to an end.

Five of Literature’s Most Powerful Examples of Gaslighting

Gaslighting in fiction predates the word itself by decades, and in some cases by centuries. These five books explore it with a clarity that cuts straight to the bone, regardless of when they were written.

Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë (1847)

Rochester is framed as a romantic hero, but a closer reading reveals a man who withholds critical information from the woman he claims to love, dismisses her accurate perceptions, and leaves her to interpret the terrifying sounds coming from his attic on her own. Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea later retold the story from the perspective of Rochester’s first wife, showing in devastating detail how a man’s insistence on rewriting a woman’s reality can destroy her entirely. He renames her, isolates her, and defines her as mad until she becomes what he says she is.

Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell (1949)

Orwell took gaslighting to its most extreme conclusion: a government that controls reality itself. The Party rewrites history daily, erases inconvenient facts, and insists that whatever it currently says has always been true. “Who controls the past controls the future.” Winston Smith knows, somewhere underneath everything, that the world is not what he is being told. The horror of the novel is watching that last certainty get dismantled too.

The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1892)

A short story that packs more psychological dread into thirty pages than most novels manage in three hundred. A woman is confined to her room by her physician husband under the diagnosis of “nervous exhaustion,” forbidden from writing or thinking too hard, and treated as though her own discomfort is the problem rather than her circumstances. The more clearly she sees what is happening, the more aggressively she is told she is imagining it.

The Girl on the Train by Paula Hawkins (2015)

Rachel’s alcoholism becomes a weapon in someone else’s hands. Her memory has gaps, which means her observations get dismissed and her account of events gets buried under her own unreliability. Hawkins makes readers feel what it is like to know something and have no credible way to say so, to be disqualified as a witness to your own life before you even open your mouth.

The Southern Book Club’s Guide to Slaying Vampires by Grady Hendrix

Patricia Campbell notices things. She notices that her charming new neighbor James Harris doesn’t add up, that children in the neighboring community are disappearing, that something is very wrong. And she is dismissed at every turn by her husband, the police, and the whole social architecture of her late-1980s Southern suburb. Hendrix makes the mechanics of gaslighting visceral in a way a textbook definition never can, and adds a sharp layer of race and class underneath: the town’s indifference to which children go missing is its own form of gaslighting writ large.

Why We Keep Writing These Stories

Gaslighting endures as a literary subject because it endures as a human experience. It is not a coincidence that so many of literature’s most famous gaslighting victims are women. Gaslighting works best when the groundwork is already laid, and societies that treat women’s emotions as suspect and their judgment as unreliable have done half the work before the gaslighter even begins. A woman who reports something alarming is hysterical, difficult, or obsessed.

The subject matter is often revisited because the dynamic keeps repeating: someone sees something clearly, someone else decides that cannot be allowed, and the slow work of dismantling that person’s confidence begins. What fiction gives us that real life often doesn’t is the view from outside the fog. We see what the victim sees and know they’re right. We feel, viscerally, what it costs them to be told otherwise. For many, the psychological horror of not being believed or to second guess one’s own sanity is all too real.

The fact that we finally have a word for it is progress. The fact that we still need so many books about it suggests we have further to go.

More Blog Posts